A tryst with the destiny

actually this title is taken from a speech made by Pt. Nehru, was made on the eve of India's independence, towards midnight on 14 August 1947. But the issue here is not that we are going to independent but here we are independent and what is the reality of independence Pt. Nehru talked about "To bring freedom and opportunity to the common man, to the peasants and workers of India; to fight and end poverty and ignorance and disease; to build up a prosperous, democratic and progressive nation, and to create social, economic and political institutions which will ensure justice and fullness of life to every man and woman" i have a question that, from last 63 years where we are ? i feel that we traveled distance but displaced zero towards what ever spoken by Pt Nehru or it was a effort just to grab some attention of the media, if it was not than what he has percolated his vision to the citizen of this country or it is just a responsibility of the some set of people those in the government to show vision and nothing else what about your vision your trust for the citizen what about there trust for there leader.

I have fortunate tryst with some people who belong to the state which is categorized as Uttar Pradesh(U.P.) the journey was started from Anand Vihar ISBT ,because me and my three other friend those, dared to visit U.P. for marriage and couldn't got in to sleeper class bogi because there wasn't enough space to breath so we planned to go by bus some how we got a man he assured that he will take us to Lucknow, and bus will start around 11 pm but from 10:30 pm to till the night 1 am. There were n number of agents belong to the owner of that bus, were trying to fill the bus, not a single seat should left so when the bus was packed around with 61 passengers, the owner comes and checked the tickets, no seat number was allotted and there were five different type of receipts was floated among the passengers, each receipt said some XYZ travels without address and only amount. That was just formal way of some psychological satisfaction to the passenger and to show that, we are not kinda third class bus service. Bus was filled than the owner counted almost five times, it was like that first time he got this much passengers and how the two drivers had driven the bus, was like 99% probability that we were in our last roller coaster ride. In the morning driver said "how can put passengers life on danger that's why it is getting late to reach Lucknow". i couldn't under stand "to bring freedom and opportunity to the common man" who are common men or the driver! or the passenger! or the owner! and where is freedom? and where is opportunity?

Further more before reaching to Lucknow just half a kilometer the gear shift was arrested under the jam he even didn't apologize and said what else i can do., we walked for half KM and we got a city bus there was no traffic signal and some of those were ,they were crying that why they are there. first time i felt like that, i am stuck in Afghanistan , were as i have not been there in Afghanistan but i can feel such, and included that i have lost my passport there. I observed only two kind of feeling on the most of the faces there, one the human was scared of getting cheated by next human, second one was any human was ready to cheat next one. no third feeling i observed. Next Pt Nehru has said to fight and end poverty actually people has concentrated on the first part to fight among them to make rich them selves individually, with respect to the other human next to him.

I must ask who are u Pt. Nehru, are you entirely different from the common man and what is the definition of common man the man who is not in politics or who is not a freedom fighter or who is not born in a political leader or in royal dynasty.

system or systems

system or systems: there are so many system as legal system, economic system, cultural system, and other social systems.
if a small human body comes out of another human body, it immediately called as part social system now instead of "it", i should use "he/she" for human body because social system doesn't allow to call a human body "it", and further more the biological process was involved was also defined under the social system as well, that is cross-functional example of biological system and social system or combination.
our discussion, yes i am allowing you too, to show your expression by because i am using a word "discussion" here, is about the systems, and when you grow, rather you live or go across the different systems, we always find that there are same type of systems but with different nature, i would like to define more specifically, the open system and the close system. those who have some kind of thermodynamics background, they might understand easily but for the others, open system defines that it allows the transfer of matter and energy across the boundary of the system and the closed system doesn't allow.

In the start it was such that biological system was bigger set and human start building the system to exchange there information matter among them and built the social system. But later the biological system became the secondary and whole the biological process and natural process is under the guard of social system which doesn't have any natural prove.

and it became the example of subset of social system
both figure used in first figure the bigger set is biological system and smaller one is social system and later the social system became bigger set and biological system smaller set. after this understanding that i sketched here, is not sufficient and, in coming days you will find something more related to this topic. which will include lots of human and social aspects and there behavior and decision abilities, and others systems as well

Forces

Forces:

Somehow I can recall that it was 1996 when I was a little young. I introduced to Newton with his “Newton’s law of universal gravitation” and “laws of motion” the same evening I went for a party with my family, there, so many people were eating and chatting to each other, all of a sudden my eyes stuck on two uncles, they were so healthy, healthy in terms of their bellies were in such a way that I was not able to see the buckles of their belts. I recalled Newton and his formula there were two terms m1, m2, I thought that these two uncles have maximum masses among all the guest in the party that is why they have strong gravitational force for each other because F is directly proportional to the product of the masses, that’s why they are talking to each other since a long time. Another interesting story that I always attracted to fat girls, so I thought that the value of m2 is more. That’s why I am feeling a force of attraction towards those girls. I checked the value of the constant was very less, so I was wrong. Otherwise, all the men would have attracted to the girls, mass>=65Kg.

Gravitational force, it explains that any two objects means bodies apply force of attraction if the mass of two bodies are m₁ and m₂ respectively than;

Where r is distance between two bodies

G is universal gravitational constant = 6.668X10^-11 N.m²/Kg²

So if the mass of the human is 60 Kg, I put a small effort to calculate the distance, where the gravitational force applied by the earth is zero, That comes nearly infinity. And that needs some more fundamentals of escape velocity etc. I calculate this distance because every human problem is on the earth only, and whenever you will jump to leave the earth as a living being, gravity pulls you back, but the distance that calculated with the assumption that at that point no other force of attraction is present. So, first of all, you have to work against gravity and reach to that distance where F=0. Which looks impossible? So to find love and happiness, I should see another way, further.

Now if I will consider two distinct humans each of having mass 60 Kg, how much force will each one apply to others;

That is negligible whatever distance on the earth you can measure, so it means that there is no Force of attraction then why people feel the force of attraction for each other, Newton’s effort in 1687 in Principia suggested something different. Is that an illusionary Force that a human feels for another human.

I don’t put my effort in such a way that all physicist would feel pity that they are not able to prove so-called love or force of attraction for there beloved with the help of Principle of physics, so I blended little calculus in it and helped Newton to establish the force of attraction between two living beings.

In this viewpoint two human means, specifically one male and one female, when they make love, with the help of sexual conduct, where we can assume that distance between two bodies is minimum say for zero so;

Hopefully, no further explanation is required regarding this viewpoint; all my effort now makes all physicists happy with calculating an enormous amount of gravitational Force for their lover using the same equation.

One another force has forced me to think about it, that is, magnetic Force, it has a property that even if you reduce the distance to any limit if they have the same pole in front of each other, they will repel each other. They will overcome the gravitational Force of attraction, I have already used so many equations and mathematics for this Post, which worth of 0 $, so without using further equations I would say that there are many types of forces present, some of in the domain of Physics some beyond that, ultimately the resultant of all forces, will only decide the displacement.

So if you are in a mood to give tribute to Newton and want to enjoy the love with zero distance. First, assure yourself and your partner too that you are not associated with any magnet. Because there are chances that when magnetic forces know that you want to enjoy the gravitational Force they will raise the rivalry against, all the forces present for attraction, including Gravitational Force, and then magnetic forces will overcome to the other forces and repel you.

My philosophy can be easily understandable, what are the forces used and what they represent themselves in this whole human context, free feel to comment rationally rather emotionally.

Prediction

if you can predict the action of a human, considering that human is with whom you interact or, we can say with whom your benefits are associated.

so if you can predict the action, you have two choices, one to live with the aftereffect of the others action. or you have another choice which is your action, you take action in such a fashion that it should control the others action and the outcome should be desired to you, whether it is with rational thinking or not!
now first case when outcome is not desired:- than you have left with first choice, i.e. to live with the aftereffect of the others action. Now you will take another action with this assumption that to control or provoke next person to do you desired action as you wanted earlier or the alternative next best desired action with alternative best outcome, it will be a chain reaction that always happened with you. second case when the out come is desired to you:- than you will think that you understand the whole world, system and you are such a rational thinker, you think that you are enough capable to control the actions and the outcome of other with your actions. but that never happens.
all the actions and under both cases discussed above; the concluding remark is that the sequences of actions always converges to the first choice means living with the aftereffect of the others actions because that is the moment when you accept that you can't control the whole actions of others and outcomes.

backpack analysis

Backpack analysis 1.0

I remember my child hood once when I was walking on the east coast with my girl friend, she was collecting all the seashells which she liked at first sight and was trying to gather in her hand after some more steps she told me to put in to her chunni when hand was not enough, she wanted one after another into her chunni , but at some point she was unable to carry the Wight of the seashells that she collected. So she stops for a moment and she sorted out the shells and throw whatever she didn’t like that moment, where as those were the shells the she liked some point time in past. The emotion behind was not get done with the rest of shells, actually she looked at some more beautiful shells that she wanted to collect and the Weight was not bearable so she decided to re-prioritize the shells

That was our child hood and we were not enough philosophical as we are now, I believe that we, means all human do the same thing for our whole life Carrying a back pack we born with some back pack items like relatives and then you walk for a life. You started your life with affection to the outer world that includes bicycle, toys, music CDs, and new dresses, further more with cellophane, bikes friends, girl friends/boyfriends, cars etc. And the moment you realize that your bag is too heavy & your shoulder is not having enough strength. You stop for a moment take out your back pack and try reshuffle it you try to priorities with your new situation and whatever which is not in priority list, u just throw in to garbage

Backpack analysis 1.1

After backpack analysis 1.0 further to address key issue like classifying the items, either the item will be materials or human in both the contexts the only common thing is attachment with material or human. However you can remove the materials from the backpack but for human we carry the relations, so as to remove the attachment, indeed the relationships. When the backpack got too heavy with relations people follow the path of philosophy that discussed in the movie “up in the air” and they try to empty their backpack,

*thing=relationship

We choose to drop the things in to the river with all our gratitude to that and walked. But if the thing was too heavy it sinks to the bottom and remains there till when the draught will come and it will again visible to you, where as we thought that it would flow with the stream so as we will get healing soon, the wounds is on our shoulder because of straps. We always act with this assumption that thing is not that heavy so as it will not remain sinking. Some of us leave/drop the things on the side by the river and hire a powerboat to find new place. But may possible this time flood comes and the thing flows with the stream and somehow has new destination, which may close to us and again visible to the things. Probably that’s why we choose to go upstream, and that’s how we reduce the weight of our back pack